Support Strategic Choices with Prioritization Frameworks

Review of the prioritization frameworks that help to make data-driven strategic choices by defining a priorities model and calculating priority score. 

Strategic Choices with Prioritization Frameworks - Prioritization Tools

Sign-up with a free plan at BSC Designer logo BSC Designer for immediate access to 31 scorecard and KPIs templates.

In strategic planning, prioritization starts with defining the high-level strategic themes that work as pillars for the rest of the strategy. What about making choices on lower levels? After using the strategic themes as an initial filter, we would still have too many choices and competing ideas.

In this article, we talk about the various prioritization frameworks that help organizations to address this challenge. The key topics of the article:

Challenge of Prioritization

Let’s take a typical situation that exists in any product company. The backlog is full of interesting ideas suggested by different stakeholders:

  • Important clients need something urgently
  • Technical support believes that certain feature will make their job easier
  • Developers suggest architectural changes to improve the quality of the product
  • Board members think that some feature will help to reach a new market

A number of prioritization frameworks can help to focus on the most important ideas. These frameworks can be divided into:

  • Prioritization diagrams – graphical diagrams that help to do a quick analysis of the ideas.
  • Scoring frameworks – prioritization scorecards that take into account various weighted factors and calculate the final priority score.

Below, we will discuss both types of prioritization frameworks. Which one to use? Common sense suggests starting with some light-weight prioritization diagram and then move on to the data-powered scoring framework.

Prioritization Matrices and Diagrams

To get started with prioritization, we can use one of the prioritization diagrams.

Priority (Eisenhower) Matrix

The Eisenhower Method or the Urgent/Important matrix is well known in the time management domain. The axes for the quadrants are “Urgency” and “Importance.”

Priority Matrix

  • The goals from the “Urgent / Important” quadrant are the first priority
  • The goals from the “Less urgent / Important” quadrant are the second priority to plan working on later
  • The goals from “Urgent / Less Important” are the third priority and supposed to be delegated
  • The goals from “Less Urgent / Less Important” should be eliminated

Similar idea is covered by the MoSCoW model. The acronym stands for:

  • M – Must Have
  • S – Should have
  • C – Could have
  • W – Will not have

Value vs. Complexity Matrix

Similar to the priority matrix, the diagram is divided into four quadrants. The axes are “Value” and “Complexity.” Sometimes, the complexity is replaced with “Cost” or “Effort.”

Value vs. Complexity Matrix

  • The first priority (the easy-wins) are the goals from the “High Value – Low Complexity” quadrant
  • The second priority is the goals from the “High Value – High Complexity” quadrant
  • The goals from “Low Value – Low Complexity” have the third priority
  • Finally, the goals from “Low Value – High Complexity” are normally rejected

Eliminating complexity itself might be a good priority, as it is typically aligned with the value for many stakeholders.

Kano Model

With the Kano Model, we measure the stakeholder satisfaction versus progress on the goal. The stakeholder satisfaction is quantified on the nonlinear scale from dissatisfaction to indifference and excitement.

  • With the Kano Model, the priorities are assigned according to the value perceived by the stakeholders.

In the context of strategic planning, using the Kano Model is especially interesting when setting the performance targets for the goals. For example, the customers might be very enthusiastic about reducing the defects rate from 1% to 0.01%, but reducing defects to 0.001% might not create any tangible value (see the cost of high quality as an illustration for this idea).

Kano Model Chart

The Kano Model underlines the need to think about the full lifecycle of an idea. For some ideas, we have to say “No,” even if they are easy to implement in the beginning.

  • Think about the long-term effects of a “small improvement” suggested by your stakeholders. How will those changes affect the total complexity of the system?

Affinity Diagrams

In strategic planning, affinity diagrams are good for the initial review of the business landscape. Imagine that the stakeholders have a long list of ideas.

  1. Find similar ideas
  2. Group ideas into bigger clusters
  3. Re-formulate your goals accordingly

Affinity Diagrams

Here is an example from our practice:

  • One user of BSC Designer required displaying values on the charts when exporting dashboards
  • Another user suggested that it would be a good idea to display the captions with the values on the charts

A common cluster idea, in this case, was that all charts with the data should have the “show annotations” option:

Show annotations function implemented as a result of affinity diagrams analysis

Two standalone ideas did not gain enough weight to become a priority, but when seen as a cluster, it became obvious that the function is required in different forms by many users.

Prioritization with “Strategic” Frameworks

Finally, it’s worth mentioning that there are some frameworks that traditionally belong to the strategic planning toolkit, while in essence, they are prioritization frameworks:

SWOT Analysis – the priority is set by matching opportunities and strength.
SWOT diagram: match or convert
Three Horizons Analysis – the priority is set according to the expected time-to-market of the new ideas.
Three Horizons Model Diagram with 70-20-10 Rule Applied
VRIO Analysis – the ideas are prioritized according to their competitiveness potential.
VRIO analysis steps

We can also name Pareto Analysis and Gap Analysis that we discuss below.

Prioritization with Scoring Frameworks

Now, let’s see if we can support strategic choices better by calculating a priority score. In essence, all scoring frameworks are about analyzing the possible ideas using certain parameters.

Here are some common principles of scoring frameworks:

  • There are factors that impact the priority score positively, like value created for the end-users and marketing opportunities
  • There are factors that impact the priority score negatively, like costs, efforts, and risks
  • The impact of the factors is quantified as a priority score
  • The degree of the contribution of a certain factor is defined by its weight
  • The factor’s scores are normalized to calculate the final priority score

Let’s review some of the scoring frameworks in detail.

Gap Analysis

The Gap Analysis is a basic scoring framework. Instead of introducing the factors and evaluating options according to those factors, we use easily available data – the performance of certain goals as measured by their performance indicators.
Gap analysis for strategy execution

The highest priority is assigned to the goals with the most significant performance gap and the highest absolute weight.

There are various derivatives of the gap analysis, like, for example, Opportunity Scoring that comes from an outcome-driven innovation process.

RICE Framework

The RICE scoring model was developed by software company Intercom. The acronym of the framework stands for:

  • Reach – an estimation of the number of stakeholders affected
  • Impact – a quantification of the expected value created for the stakeholders as a result of reaching the goal (in the case of Intercom, the scale was from 0.25 to 3)
  • Confidence – whether the decision is based on pure intuition or there is some data that supports the choice
  • Effort – an estimation of the resources needed to reach the goal

AARRR Framework

AARRR framework (also called Pirate Metrics) is popular among startups. The acronym stands for:

  • Acquisition – getting more users for the product
  • Activation – making users unlock the potential of the product
  • Retention – giving users the reasons to use the product for a longer time
  • Revenue – increasing revenue by, for example, increasing average check
  • Referral – making users recommend your product to others

Ideas and goals are scored using AARRR’s components as parameters. The goal with the highest score has the highest potential to impact business positively.

North Star or Keystone Metric

Both the “North Star” and “Keystone” metric refer to the same idea:

A single metric that quantifies the value the organization creates for the customers

Instead of using many validation parameters, as we did with the previous frameworks, we look at just one factor – the potential impact of the suggested idea on the keystone metric.

For example, when we were talking about metrics for safety, we used the Alcoa company as an example of a keystone metric. In their case, the metric was focused on the number of safety incidents.

  • The idea of using just one metric to prioritize all business goals sounds very attractive, but in reality, the complexity of choice was not limited, it was just moved to a different place.

For example, if we want to understand how the new partnership network would impact the North Star metric, we would need to analyze and quantify all the challenges in the middle, and this doesn’t make the prioritization task any easier.

ICE Scoring

ICE scoring is an interesting derivative of the North Star metric. The ICE formula is as simple as:

  • ICE Score  = Impact * Confidence * Easy


  • Impact is a projected impact on the key value metric (the North Star metric)
  • Confidence is a quantification of the degree of accuracy of the impact estimation
  • Easy is an estimation of the efforts (costs, resources needed, etc.)

The values of the ICE parts are presented on a scale of 1-10. Once multiplied, they give us a priority estimation to compare one idea against another.

Assigning the scores is quite subjective. For example, for Confidence, the scale might be like this:

  • 10 – results of the real implementations
  • 6 – results of the test, MVP
  • 4 – top users requested this
  • 3 – supported by some customer data
  • 1 – few potential customers mentioned this
  • 0.1 – ideas from non-users (mentioned by industry experts or press)

Business Pain Point

Similar to the North Star and Kano Model, the focus of this model is on the value for the customers. The major difference is that we look at the value from the viewpoint of pain points.

How to find those pain points? Be the customer of your product as we discussed in the complexity article, or simply ask your clients using light-weight surveys.

Pareto Analysis

Before, we discussed Pareto Analysis as a strategic planning tool. In terms of prioritization, Pareto Analysis promotes a very simple idea:

80% of the value created is attributed to 20% of the activities

While the historical analysis typically confirms the 80/20 ratio, there is no simple way to find those 20% beforehand.

Pareto analysis template in BSC Designer

Pareto Analysis Template
Sign-up with a free plan to access Pareto Analysis Template as well as 31 other scorecard templates.

Basically, the mentioned ratio:

  • Justifies the use of prioritization frameworks and
  • Suggests limiting the experiments to those most promising 20%.

Using Scorecard to Prioritize Goals

What strategy prioritization frameworks should your organization use and how to calculate a priority score?

In practice, most organizations build their own version of the prioritization framework. For the users of BSC Designer, we have included the prioritization template in the templates available in the software.

Below we discuss:

  • How to build your own prioritization scorecard
  • An example of using this template

Prepare the Prioritization Template and Scorecard

Create a new scorecard using the “Prioritization” template:

Select prioritization template available in BSC Designer

Prioritization Template
Sign-up with a free plan to access Prioritization Template as well as 31 other scorecard templates.

In the “Prioritization template” group, you will see the list of the default evaluation parameters. We used parameters from the RICE framework for this example.

RICE prioritization framework in BSC Designer

Prioritization Template
Sign-up with a free plan to access Prioritization Template as well as 31 other scorecard templates.

Let’s see how these parameters are pre-configured and how they can be adjusted according to the needs of your prioritization model.

Weight of Parameters

Each parameter has a relevant weight (see the “Weight” column). The weight of a specific parameter can be changed on the “Performance” tab.

Weight of prioritization parameter in BSC Designer

Positive vs. Negative Parameters

Some parameters are pre-configured as parameters with a positive impact on the final priority score (reach, impact, confidence), some as negative ones (Effort).

The optimization direction of the parameter can be changed on the Performance tab.

Negative impact parameter

Prioritization Template
Sign-up with a free plan to access Prioritization Template as well as 31 other scorecard templates.

Measurement Units

All parameters are pre-configured to use the “Expert Score” measure units that quantify the parameters on a nonlinear scale:

Expert score measurement units in BSC Designer

Prioritization Template
Sign-up with a free plan to access Prioritization Template as well as 31 other scorecard templates.

In this way, we can decide about the value of each parameter using a natural choice option:

Natural choice measurement units

If the suggested “Expert Score” measurement unit doesn’t fit the needs of your priority model, then you can configure different measurement units on the “General” tab:

Select other measurement units

Prioritization Template
Sign-up with a free plan to access Prioritization Template as well as 31 other scorecard templates.

Parameter Icon

To make the priority scorecard easier to read, we’ve adjusted icons for the parameters. You can change the icon by clicking on the icon next to the parameter name:

Change an icon of the parameter

Parameter Description

A short name, like “Impact,” needs some more explanation. Use the “Description” field for this purpose.

An Example: Prioritization Model in Practice

To showcase the prioritization template in action, I’ll use two competing ideas:

  • Localize product to Latin
  • Localize product to Portuguese

Create a Copy of the Prioritization Model

To organize things a little bit, let’s create a new group called “Example: analysis of the priorities.”

Prioritization template copied

Prioritization Template
Sign-up with a free plan to access Prioritization Template as well as 31 other scorecard templates.

Now, we can copy and paste the prioritization template into the group.

I renamed the first copy to “Localization to Latin,” and the second group to “Localization to Portuguese.”

Two ideas for evaluation are now copied

Score Competing Ideas

Now, it’s time to score two ideas according to the suggested parameters.

While Latin still has its application area, for our example, we consider that there are not many stakeholders interested in having Latin localization. Respectively, the score for the “Reach” (see the “Value” field) will be “Low”:

Latin translation option scored with prioritization framework

Let’s assign scores to the idea of localization to Portuguese:

  • On the one hand, the use of Portuguese by our target audience (the “Reach” parameter) is “High,” and the impact of the localization is supposed to be “Important.
  • On the other hand, we don’t know for sure if the product-market fit will be reached for the Portuguese-speaking market, so the confidence level is set to Average:

Priorities defined for a second option

Prioritization Template
Sign-up with a free plan to access Prioritization Template as well as 31 other scorecard templates.

If you plan to use the results of the prioritization for strategic planning, I’d recommend to note down the ideas that stand behind the assigned score.

In BSC Designer, there is an “Initiatives” tool for this purpose.

For example, for the “Confidence” parameter, we can create an initiative called “Analysis of the stakeholders from local market” where we will review the website analytics data  and analyze historical sales from local market:

An example of the initiative for prioritization

Another initiative can be the “Resources for localization” aligned with the “Efforts” parameter. This initiative can include the budget needed for the localization, as well as the estimated timeline.

An example of prioritization initiative with budget

Prioritization Template
Sign-up with a free plan to access Prioritization Template as well as 31 other scorecard templates.

The Priority Score Can Evolve

In BSC Designer, the priority scores are time-specific. Imagine that your team worked on the mentioned market analysis initiative and now is more confident about the expected product-market fit.

To reflect this in the software, we can pick another date in the internal calendar and update the value for the “Confidence” parameter.

If you plan to visualize the dynamic of priority score on a dashboard, you can track that the improvement in the priority score was due to the completion of the initiative:

Confidence score and initiative on the chart


Find the Ideas with Highest Priority

As long as we introduce new data, the software updates the priority scores for the ideas:

Find ideas with the highest priority score

Latin, in this example, got the 15.5% priority score, while Portuguese got 59.17%. How does the software get this data? It normalizes parameters, calculates the priority of each parameter, and then uses the weights of the parameters to calculate the total priority score. We discussed calculation nuances in this article.

Having just two competing ideas, it’s clear which one got higher priority. When you have more ideas to compare, use the Analysis function. Sort the results by the priority score (performance) and focus the analysis on the containers only (the competing ideas):

Analysis of the alternatives and their priority scores

Prioritization Template
Sign-up with a free plan to access Prioritization Template as well as 31 other scorecard templates.

The list of items is now sorted by their priorities.


In this article, we discussed various prioritization frameworks: the basic ones based on a simple diagram or more complex that help to calculate a priority score. We also discussed how to use the prioritization template in practice.

A priority score might sound like a good tool. In general, it is, but there are always some crazy ideas that never get a sufficient priority score. Be sure your organization stays open to those ideas and passes them through proper innovative analysis.

What's next?

  • Access templates. Sign-up with a free plan at BSC Designer for immediate access to 31 scorecard templates, including Prioritization Template discussed in this article.
  • Master skills. Check out free video tutorial for the Balanced Scorecard. Master your strategy planning and execution skills with Strategy Execution training.
  • Automate. Learn what Balanced Scorecard software is and how it can make your life easier by automating strategy execution, KPIs, and strategy maps.

Online wizard will help even inexperienced users to create a professional strategy map with business goals, KPIs, and initiatives.

Strategy Map Wizard – Balanced Scorecard in 6 Minutes

Answer simple questions - build a professional strategy map in 6 minutes.

Strategy formulation and description might be a time-consuming project even for an experienced strategist. This Strategy Scorecard Wizard will make the whole process fast and intuitive.

Start now!

More About Strategic Planning

Strategic Planning Process:
BSC Designer software will support your team on all steps of strategic planning.
Examples of the Balanced Scorecard:
Examples of the Balanced Scorecard with KPIs
Strategy Maps:
8 Steps to Create a Strategy Map By BSC Designer
Cite as: Aleksey Savkin, "Support Strategic Choices with Prioritization Frameworks," BSC Designer, July 22, 2020,

Leave a Comment