A Financial Perspective of the Balanced Scorecard

There are normally no problems with defining objectives for the financial perspective of the Balanced Scorecard for profit-oriented organizations. Any business has financial goals, and is accustomed to using financial metrics. For  most businesses the challenges are to shift a focus from financial perspective only to the Customer, Internal, and Learning & Growth perspectives.

Financial perspective for non-profit

The “financial” word in the name of the perspective might sound confusing for non-profit organizations. They are not targeting financial outcomes, but some social, cultural, political… goals. Still, non-profit organizations have stakeholders that might be the members of communities that founded the organization, and in this case financial perspective is actually a “Stakeholder Interests” perspective or “Success” perspective.

Financial perspective of the Balanced Scorecard for non-profit

View View Financial Perspective online in BSC Designer Financial Perspective online and use it as a template.

The financial perspective is on the top of the Balanced Scorecard strategy map, which is acceptable by for-profit organizations. Non-profits tend to put it below other perspectives or in a separate resource part. This might be the case. But let’s have a look at a simple example: “funds raised” metric, it is a financial metric, but it is not a resource one, it is an outcome. So we still need a “Success / Stakeholders Interests” perspective on the top, which will reflect designed outcomes (not necessary financial ones).

  • To define objectives from “Stakeholders Interest,” it is good idea for formulate the question: “How does your department define their success?”

Framework for Finance Perspective

Let’s have a look at the 3 generic strategies:

  • Product Leadership Strategy.
  • Customer Value Strategy.
  • Operational Excellence Strategy.

Financial perspective of the Balanced Scorecard

View View Financial Perspective online in BSC Designer Financial Perspective online and use it as a template.

One of the interpretations is to project these strategies on Revenue Growth and Productivity objectives:

  • Revenue Growth objective can be achieved by:
    • Developing new revenue sources (creating new products and services). This is primarily a projection of Product Leadership strategy.
    • Improving current profitability (working on customer value proposition). This is primarily a projection of Customer Value strategy.
  • Productivity objective incorporates the projection of Operation Excellence strategy:
    • Decreasing costs.
    • Resource optimization.

Depending on the scale of the business these objectives can be formulated in  various ways:

  • Small businesses might want to find and employee a new technology that would allow to decrease costs;
  • Large companies might achieve resource optimization by sharing resources and technologies between departments, or achieving economic outcome by scaling production;

Balance inside the Financial perspective

As it was mentioned before, a typical balanced scorecard problem is that is not balanced and too much attention is paid to the financial perspective. At the same time, another imbalance is often seen inside financial perspective itself, where managers tend to focus on what can give faster results (Productivity objectives), and tend to ignore long term opportunities provided by Revenue Growth objectives. Make sure that this is not the case in your business scorecard.

Online wizard will help even inexperienced users to create a professional strategy map with business goals, KPIs, and initiatives.

Strategy Map Wizard – Balanced Scorecard in 6 Minutes

Answer simple questions - build a professional strategy map in 6 minutes.

Strategy formulation and description might be a time-consuming project even for an experienced strategist. This Strategy Scorecard Wizard will make the whole process fast and intuitive. Learn more!

Start now!

Cascading exercise

Let’s perform a cascading exercise for some objective from a finance perspective. For this example let’s take “Operational Excellence” generic strategy and its projection on Finance perspective, particularly a “Decreasing costs” objective.

Executive level

Objective: Decrease Costs

Lagging measure: Achieved costs reduction, %

Leading measure: Time invested in the analysis of the problem.

Initiative: Build development and marketing costs map

 Сascading financial perspective

View View Financial Perspective online in BSC Designer Financial Perspective online and use it as a template.

R&D department level

Objective: Decrease production costs

Lagging measure: Achieved production costs reduction, %

Leading measure: The number of experts interviewed about the problem.

Initiative: Build production costs map; Determine possible improvement opportunities;

Senior engineer level

Objective: Decrease product testing costs

Lagging measure: Achieved testing costs reduction, %

Leading measure: The number of tested solutions.

Initiative: Find and implement test automation tool.

As you can see, the leading metrics are generic ones.

Focus on objectives, not metrics

Sometimes strategists are trying to be more specific with leading and lagging metrics, or even take them from 3rd party lists. I would recommend being really careful about this. In the early stage in the most cases it is impossible to come up with indicators (especially leading ones) that will reflect the strategy properly. Those indicators give a mock control over the performance.

My recommendation is to start with some generic indicators or metrics according to the expert opinion. You are not trying to build a KPI scorecard, but a Strategy scorecard. It is more important to have correct objectives, than metrics.

Premium Balanced Scorecard TrainingFor now, all of the discussed ideas might sound like very complex ones. We have an online training called “Building Balanced Scorecard Step by Step” where under our guidance and following our examples you can build a prototype of your own balanced scorecard. Check out the training schedule and details.

Lessons learned

Here is a short summary of what we have discussed so far about Financial Perspective.

  • One needs to formulate on these perspective “success” goals.
    • For-product companies define success in terms of shareholders interest;
    • Non-profits define it in terms of stakeholders interest;
  • Generic strategies can be projected on a finance perspective as:
    • Revenue Growth goal with two sub-goals;
    • Productivity Goals with two sub-goals;
  • Avoid focusing too much on financial perspective, and financial metrics
Use Financial Perspective discussed in this article as a starting template for your own scorecard! Learn how to copy it to your account.

View Financial Perspective online

Other perspectives of the Balanced Scorecard

What do you think about Financial Perspective? Do you use similar or distinct financial objectives on your strategy map? Feel free to share your thoughts in the comments.

Related Articles

Scorecard Expert | Speaker | CEO. Aleksey Savkin (LinkedIn, @bscdesigner) is helping companies to better formulate their strategies and make the process of strategy execution more tangible with KPIs. New book by Aleksey: 10 Step KPI System

If you prefer to receive posts like these by email sign up to our newsletter.

Posted in Introduction to BSC
Tags: ,

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Thank you for sharing!

Whether you are looking for a professional Balanced Scorecard software, or just researching information about Balanced Scorecard and business strategies, we recommend you to download and try our BSC Designer software (no credit card is required).

We will follow up with you with lessons about the Balanced Scorecard and will keep you informed about the trending articles on bscdesigner.com

Follow us in Social Media

More in Introduction to BSC
Extend Your Balanced Scorecard up to 8 Perspectives

What are the strengths of this framework and where do we need to yet improve it? I have already alluded...

Stop Measuring All the Wrong Things – Measurement Inversion

A while ago, Doug Hubbard introduced me to the concept of measurement inversion. According to him the more something matters...